Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie sounded off about the NFL potentially banning the tush push, saying if it wasn't a safe play, they wouldn't be running it.

The vote on whether or not to ban the Eagles' infamous "Tush Push" play has been delayed for later discussion. More from NFL owners meetings:

PALM BEACH, Fla. − The NFL owners tabled a vote to ban the Eagles ' Tush Push on Tuesday. The Green Bay Packers had submitted the proposal, banning players from pushing "immediately" at the snap, the player lined up behind the center.

The future of the “tush push” remains in flux after NFL owners opted to table the vote on whether or not to ban it on Tuesday. But the controversial play still sparked plenty of conversation among league coaches at the league annual meeting in Palm Beach,

A number of rule-change proposals were up for vote on Tuesday at the league's annual spring meeting, with a potential ban on the Philadelphia Eagles' infamous "tush push" headlining the list. Many fans—and many who are directly involved with other NFL teams—have viewed the Eagles' variation on the quarterback sneak as an unfair competitive advantage.

Matt LaFleur says the tush push isn’t a “football play" and focuses on undocumented safety concerns when explaining his opposition to the Eagles

The rule change that would have banned the tush push was tabled. If coach Mike Macdonald's comments are any indications, it's clear how the Seahawks voted.

The fate of the controversial quarterback sneak, which was popularized by the Philadelphia Eagles, hangs in the balance ahead of next season.

As the league prepares to vote on whether to abolish the Eagles’ unstoppable short-yardage play, let’s be clear: This isn’t a safety issue.