If you read our launch article from a couple of weeks ago, you already know how Intel's high-end Core 2 Duo E6700 and Core 2 Extreme X6800 processors perform. But what about the lower-end model's in ...
In the X3: Reunion test the E6400 was just 7% slower than the E6700 at 1280x1024, which worked out to be just 6fps. The E6400 was on the other hand 9% faster than the E6300, which proves the Core 2 ...
Intel's Core 2 Duo line marks the end of AMD's run of dominance through the dual-core desktop-processor landscape. Not only are Intel's new chips fast, efficient, and well designed, but they're also ...
While they didn’t quite fry an egg over their CPU, the brainy folks over at Toms Hardware did manage to overclock a lowly Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 up to 3.1GHz (from its base 2.13GHz) using only the ...
Despite the fact that we are testing the performance of three Core 2 Duo processors today Intel has launched no less than five models in a variation of 1.6 to 2.67 GHz. The processors with ...
It's been a tough couple of years for the world's top processor manufacturer, but the chipmaker's new Core 2 microarchitecture and a renewed sense of paranoia promises to make Intel processors ...
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events ...
24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events ...
As you can see from the SiSoft2007 memory results each time the Core 2 Duo drops ~270MHz, roughly 50~80MB/s of memory bandwidth is lost. This is not a lot and should not really hurt the lower Core 2 ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results