Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. Yesterday’s unanimous decision in Cox Communications v. Sony Entertainment surprised no one who observed the argument, which ...

The US Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that Cox Communications cannot be held liable for piracy by its internet service subscribers of songs owned by Sony Music, Warner Music Group, Universal Music ...

In its recently released 2024 annual review, HighSpeedInternet.com (HSI) ranked Cox as the fastest internet service provider (ISP) in the nation based on average download speeds for all of 2023. Cox ...

According to the most recent U.S. Census data, the nation’s population of individuals aged 65 and older is growing rapidly. As of 2020, the country had 55.8 million senior citizens, making up 16.8% of ...

Atlanta-based internet service provider Cox Communications filed a petition Thursday seeking U.S. Supreme Court review of a long-running copyright infringement case that the company said threatens ...

Cox Communications asked a court to block Rhode Island’s plan for distributing $108.7 million in federal funding for broadband deployment. If successful, Cox’s lawsuit could prevent other Internet ...

The Supreme Court in Cox Communications v. Sony Music clarified that internet providers are not liable for user copyright infringement unless they show clear intent to promote or facilitate piracy.

Press releases are posted on Independent.com as a free community service. Santa Barbara, CA- May 2, 2025 – Cox Communications announced the launch of StayConnect Wifi, a backup internet service using ...

The cable broadband provider -- available to customers across 19 states (and Washington, DC) -- scored top marks in Ookla's Speedtest Intelligence report. Trey Paul was a CNET senior editor covering ...

Cox Communications has launched a low-cost streaming television service for its Internet customers in San Diego and three other markets in Southern California. The cable company announced Thursday the ...

The ruling says Cox didn’t provide a service dedicated to copyright infringement; it ‘simply provided internet access.’ The ruling says Cox didn’t provide a service dedicated to copyright infringement ...