The 9-0 ruling overturned a lower court's decision to order a new trial to determine how much the internet service provider ...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with internet service provider Cox Communications in its copyright fight with record ...

The unanimous decision means Cox Communications will probably not have to pay a huge judgment in a case brought by dozens of ...

Major record labels including Sony Music Entertainment sued Cox, accusing the company of failing to adequately address repeated infringement notices and of not terminating service to known infringers.

The Supreme Court sided with internet provider Cox Communications, holding that it cannot be held liable for music piracy ...

The U. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday Cox Communications cannot be held liable for piracy by its internet service ...

Leading music labels sued Cox Communications for failing to terminate accounts of subscribers flagged for distributing ...

Wednesday’s decision in Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment is part of a broader pattern. It is one of a handful ...

The ruling says Cox didn’t provide a service dedicated to copyright infringement; it ‘simply provided internet access.’ ...

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that an internet service provider was not liable for copyright infringement when its ...

Cox v. Sony' is a case in which the legal stakes were incredibly high, but the underlying legal dispute was technical and dry ...