Jun 26, 2012 · Can someone give me an idea of how R.Graham reached Graham's Number as an upper bound on the solution of the related problem ? Thanks !

Aug 8, 2023 · Tony - Graham's number, for a time, was the largest number ever to have appeared in a mathematical proof. It's named after Ron Graham, who is an American mathematician. He was …

Dec 18, 2016 · 3 See YouTube or wikipedia for the defination of Graham's number. A Googol is defined as $10^ {100}$. A Googolplex is defined as $10^ {\text {Googol}}$. A Googolplexian is defined as …

I'm about to prove that Graham's number is a number that is so big there is no way of intuitively grasping the magnitude of it, but in order to do this we must start with the very small and work our way up. We …

Apr 26, 2021 · The size difference between Graham's number and what you suggest is almost exactly Graham's number.

Oct 14, 2024 · I also learned about Graham's number, which is a lot smaller than TREE (3). Yet, is there some way to find out if there is a point where g (n) > TREE (3), where g (n) is the layer of Graham's …

Jan 7, 2016 · It is difficult to describe the magnitude of Graham's number. With power towers , it is hopeless to describe it because the height of the power tower would have a comparable magnitude.

May 15, 2019 · Coming up with the number was not the hard part, but comparing it with Graham's number turned out to be really hard. So the number is the following, imagine 'the largest number with …

Mar 31, 2022 · As I explain in this 4 March 2002 sci.math post, depending on the reference used, Graham's number is either between $2\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 61$ and …

Now I learn about Graham's number from Numberphile which is probably where that Google search should have redirected you by now. We obviously also know (from Numberphile) how off the scale if …